Association of close-range contact patterns with SARS-CoV-2: a household transmission study.

Background: Households are an important location for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission, especially during periods when travel and work was restricted to essential services. We aimed to assess the association of close-range contact patterns with SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Methods: We deployed proximity sensors for two weeks to measure face-to-face interactions between household members after SARS-CoV-2 was identified in the household, in South Africa, 2020-2021. We calculated the duration, frequency, and average duration of close-range proximity events with SARS-CoV-2 index cases. We assessed the association of contact parameters with SARS-CoV-2 transmission using mixed effects logistic regression accounting for index and household member characteristics. Results: We included 340 individuals (88 SARS-CoV-2 index cases and 252 household members). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 acquisition were index cases with minimum Ct value <30 (aOR 16.8 95% CI 3.1-93.1) vs >35, and female contacts (aOR 2.5 95% CI 1.3-5.0). No contact parameters were associated with acquisition (aOR 1.0-1.1) for any of the duration, frequency, cumulative time in contact, or average duration parameters. Conclusions: We did not find an association between close-range proximity events and SARS-CoV-2 household transmission. Our findings may be due to study limitations, that droplet-mediated transmission during close-proximity contacts plays a smaller role than airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the household, or due to high contact rates in households. Funding: Wellcome Trust (Grant number 221003/Z/20/Z) in collaboration with the Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office, United Kingdom.

Household Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 From Adult Index Cases With and Without Human Immunodeficiency Virus in South Africa, 2020-2021: A Case-Ascertained, Prospective, Observational Household Transmission Study.

BACKGROUND: In South Africa, 19% of adults are living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; LWH). Few data on the influence of HIV on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) household transmission are available. METHODS: We performed a case-ascertained, prospective household transmission study of symptomatic adult index SARS-CoV-2 cases LWH and not living with HIV (NLWH) and their contacts from October 2020 to September 2021. Households were followed up 3 times a week for 6 weeks to collect nasal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing. We estimated household cumulative infection risk (HCIR) and duration of SARS-CoV-2 positivity (at a cycle threshold value <30 as proxy for high viral load). RESULTS: HCIR was 59% (220 of 373), not differing by index HIV status (60% LWH vs 58% NLWH). HCIR increased with index case age (35-59 years: adjusted OR [aOR], 3.4; 95% CI, 1.5-7.8 and ≥60 years: aOR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.0-10.1) compared with 18-34 years and with contacts' age, 13-17 years (aOR, 7.1; 95% CI, 1.5-33.9) and 18-34 years (aOR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.0-18.4) compared with <5 years. Mean positivity was longer in cases LWH (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, .1-.9). CONCLUSIONS: Index HIV status was not associated with higher HCIR, but cases LWH had longer positivity duration. Adults aged >35 years were more likely to transmit and individuals aged 13-34 to be infected SARS-CoV-2 in the household. As HIV infection may increase transmission, health services must maintain HIV testing and antiretroviral therapy initiation.

Significance of lymph node fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of HIV-associated lymphoma in a low-resource setting.

OBJECTIVE: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is an early step in the work-up of lymphadenopathy in people with HIV (PWH). We set out to characterize the FNA cytology in PWH and report on the time to lymphoma diagnosis through the FNA clinics in the public healthcare system in Johannesburg, South Africa. DESIGN: Retrospective review of laboratory database. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing FNA through the department of cytopathology at the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) was undertaken. Results of FNAs performed between March and May 2018 were reviewed. Medical record chart abstraction included general demographics, HIV status, site and results of FNA, prior history of malignancy and other laboratory data. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-nine lymph node FNAs were performed on PWH. Pathological findings included tuberculosis 47% (252), inadequate sampling 14% (75), reactive adenopathy 13% (71), benign disease 12% (63), suspicious for lymphoproliferative neoplasm 8% (45), other malignancy 4% (21) and inflammation 2% ( n  = 12). Only 53% (24) of lymphomas were confirmed by biopsy. Those not confirmed had a high mortality (57%) and loss to follow-up rate (29%) over the following year. The median diagnostic interval exceeded 8 weeks from time of FNA to lymphoma diagnosis. CONCLUSION: FNA is an important screening modality in this high HIV and tuberculosis (TB) burden region. Patients with cytology suggestive for lymphoma, but without biopsy confirmation, have a high mortality rate suggesting undiagnosed lymphoma. A better understanding of the barriers to appropriate diagnostic triage for lymphoma is needed.